This paper investigates the possibility of resolving normative conflicts between the European Convention of Human Rights and the UN Charter through the equivalent protection doctrine, as recently ruled by the European Court of Human Rights (2nd Section) in the Al-Dulimi case. After a brief survey of the relevant case law, the author holds that this is not a suitable solution, since it is prevented by the Article 103 of the Charter. Conversely, the European Court should give priority to Security Council resolutions as long as they are given in accordance to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

La dottrina della protezione equivalente nei rapporti tra CEDU e Nazioni Unite alla luce della prassi più recente della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo

VENTRONE, MARIO
2015-01-01

Abstract

This paper investigates the possibility of resolving normative conflicts between the European Convention of Human Rights and the UN Charter through the equivalent protection doctrine, as recently ruled by the European Court of Human Rights (2nd Section) in the Al-Dulimi case. After a brief survey of the relevant case law, the author holds that this is not a suitable solution, since it is prevented by the Article 103 of the Charter. Conversely, the European Court should give priority to Security Council resolutions as long as they are given in accordance to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ventrone 1.2015_.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 495.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
495.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/161809
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact