The paper discusses the problem of action explanation starting from some well-known theses of G.E.M. Anscombe about the concept of intention and the variety of descriptions of an action. Intentional descriptions of actions are those that embody the intention or reason why an action was performed. This thesis was supported also by Donald Davidson in his theory of action and the explanation of action by redescription. The significance of this thesis is emphasized here because it implies the intensionality of action explanation. And inten sionality shows that action explanations – which are instances of attribution of propositional attitudes – are largely based on the method of empathic understanding, as it had been remarked by W.V. Quine.
Action explanation, intensionality, and empathy. From Anscombe to Quine (via Davidson)
RAINONE, ANTONIO
2017-01-01
Abstract
The paper discusses the problem of action explanation starting from some well-known theses of G.E.M. Anscombe about the concept of intention and the variety of descriptions of an action. Intentional descriptions of actions are those that embody the intention or reason why an action was performed. This thesis was supported also by Donald Davidson in his theory of action and the explanation of action by redescription. The significance of this thesis is emphasized here because it implies the intensionality of action explanation. And inten sionality shows that action explanations – which are instances of attribution of propositional attitudes – are largely based on the method of empathic understanding, as it had been remarked by W.V. Quine.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
RAINONE (2017)_Action explanation, intensionality, and empathy.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
312.78 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
312.78 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.