The paper identifies texts that are precarious not just as regards their physical state, but also in metalinguistic terms, and are considered of secondary importance in literature circles and elsewhere. Three types of phenomena can therefore be identified, for which the definitions “crosstextuality”, “pertextuality” and “surtextuality” are sug - gested. Focusing in particular on the second of these, this is a summary of the description.
Precarietà testuale e pertestualità: qualche considerazione sulla relativa classificazione e sugli aspetti metalinguistici
Alberto Manco
2016-01-01
Abstract
The paper identifies texts that are precarious not just as regards their physical state, but also in metalinguistic terms, and are considered of secondary importance in literature circles and elsewhere. Three types of phenomena can therefore be identified, for which the definitions “crosstextuality”, “pertextuality” and “surtextuality” are sug - gested. Focusing in particular on the second of these, this is a summary of the description.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
3. Manco Alberto - Precarietà testuale e pertestualità - in Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
367.09 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
367.09 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
