Within the borders of the national States the effective exercise of power is modulated through a plurality of territorial divisions that represent, at the same time, the architecture of the institutional system and the intermediate bodies of the centre/ periphery relations. These relationships gave rise to multiple centres of political government that are grafted into the game of scales, with variable geometries, of local territories, no longer classifiable in a binary opposition, affirmed between the age of Enlightenment and the first half of the Twentieth century. The analysis of this interwoven aspects (social, institutional, territorial) in which citizenship horizons coagulate, the political geography of institutional spaces for the government of the territory can unleash all its heuristic potential, revealing profiles partly unexplored for the extent of their social grip. The essay aims to underline the preeminent political nature of territorial orders, of the processes that govern the construction of the institutional mosaic and the design of the different boundaries. It critically reconstructs the state of the art of the themes – placed at the confluence of various knowledge – put to work in the research dedicated to the relationships between spatiality/statehood/administrative boundaries/ citizenship, starting from the studies of political-administrative geography. It then identifies the main methodological acquisitions and the stimuli coming from the advances produced in different disciplinary fronts. Among the many solicitations emerges the shared opinion on the opportunity of a critical genealogy of the thought patterns of modernity, relativizing many of the categories on which we have built the idea of the modern territorial State and the forms with which it has been represented over time.

Territori istituzionali, spazi sociali: note in margine a una geografia politica delle circoscrizioni amministrative

Floriana Galluccio
2019-01-01

Abstract

Within the borders of the national States the effective exercise of power is modulated through a plurality of territorial divisions that represent, at the same time, the architecture of the institutional system and the intermediate bodies of the centre/ periphery relations. These relationships gave rise to multiple centres of political government that are grafted into the game of scales, with variable geometries, of local territories, no longer classifiable in a binary opposition, affirmed between the age of Enlightenment and the first half of the Twentieth century. The analysis of this interwoven aspects (social, institutional, territorial) in which citizenship horizons coagulate, the political geography of institutional spaces for the government of the territory can unleash all its heuristic potential, revealing profiles partly unexplored for the extent of their social grip. The essay aims to underline the preeminent political nature of territorial orders, of the processes that govern the construction of the institutional mosaic and the design of the different boundaries. It critically reconstructs the state of the art of the themes – placed at the confluence of various knowledge – put to work in the research dedicated to the relationships between spatiality/statehood/administrative boundaries/ citizenship, starting from the studies of political-administrative geography. It then identifies the main methodological acquisitions and the stimuli coming from the advances produced in different disciplinary fronts. Among the many solicitations emerges the shared opinion on the opportunity of a critical genealogy of the thought patterns of modernity, relativizing many of the categories on which we have built the idea of the modern territorial State and the forms with which it has been represented over time.
2019
Territoires institutionnels, espaces sociaux : notes en marge à une géographie politique des districts administratifs À l’intérieur des frontières des États nationaux, l’exercice effectif du pouvoir est modulé par une multiplicité de découpages territoriaux qui représentent, à la fois, l’architecture du système institutionnel et les organes intermédiaires des relations centre/périphérie. Ces relations ont été à l’origine de centres multiples de gouvernement politique qui se sont greffés sur le jeu d’échelles à géométries variables des territoires locaux, ne pouvant plus être encadrées dans une opposition binaire, affirmée entre l’âge des Lumières et la première moitié du XXe siècle. En analysant l’imbrication de plans (sociaux, institutionnels, territoriaux) dans lesquels se coagulent des horizons de citoyenneté, la géographie politique des espaces institutionnels pour le gouvernement territorial peut libérer tout son potentiel heuristique, révélant des profils en partie inexplorés, concernant l’étendue de leur emprise sociale. L’essai vise à souligner le caractère politique prééminent des ordres territoriaux, des processus qui régissent la construction de la mosaïque institutionnelle et la conception des différentes limites administratives. Il reconstruit de manière critique l’état de l’art des thèmes – situés au confluent de diverses connaissances – mis à profit par les recherches consacrées aux relations entre spatialité/État/limites administratives/citoyenneté, à partir des études de géographie politico-administrative. Il identifie, ensuite, les principales acquisitions méthodologiques et les stimuli découlant des avancements réalisées dans de multiples fronts disciplinaires. Parmi les nombreuses sollicitations émergeants on constate l’opinion partagée sur l’opportunité d’une généalogie critique des modèles de pensée de la modernité, relativisant les nombreuses catégories sur lesquelles nous avons construit l’idée de l’État territorial moderne et les formes avec lesquelles il a été représenté au fil du temps.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019 Territori istituzionali.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 1.75 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.75 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/190534
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact