This paper analyzes the different ways in which the crisis is codified in two novels: Goetz’s Johann Holtrop (2012) and Timms Vogelweide (2013). The crisis of the New Economy in the 2000s profoundly transforms the lifes of both main characters, respectively a top-manager and the owner of a software company, but with divergent outcomes: while Holtrop strives unsuccessfully to recapture his place in the world (and in this he reproduces in a neurotic way the time-accelerating mechanisms of the crisis), Eschenbach in Vogelweide retreats to an uninhabited North Sea island. There he resists the compulsion to optimize time, and thus to dramatize and teleologize the time of the crisis; he discovers a language that has not been colonized by the crisis – he gains time, „lifetime“. This paradigm shift from „world-time“ to „lifetime“ (Blumenberg) has narratological relevance to a literature of crisis that seeks to elude the dominant, media-driven crisis discourse with its rhetoric of salvation and condemnation.

Verlorene Posten. Krise und Zeit in Goetz’ "Johann Holtrop" und Timms "Vogelweide"

Sergio Corrado
2022-01-01

Abstract

This paper analyzes the different ways in which the crisis is codified in two novels: Goetz’s Johann Holtrop (2012) and Timms Vogelweide (2013). The crisis of the New Economy in the 2000s profoundly transforms the lifes of both main characters, respectively a top-manager and the owner of a software company, but with divergent outcomes: while Holtrop strives unsuccessfully to recapture his place in the world (and in this he reproduces in a neurotic way the time-accelerating mechanisms of the crisis), Eschenbach in Vogelweide retreats to an uninhabited North Sea island. There he resists the compulsion to optimize time, and thus to dramatize and teleologize the time of the crisis; he discovers a language that has not been colonized by the crisis – he gains time, „lifetime“. This paradigm shift from „world-time“ to „lifetime“ (Blumenberg) has narratological relevance to a literature of crisis that seeks to elude the dominant, media-driven crisis discourse with its rhetoric of salvation and condemnation.
2022
978-3-631-88919-0
Der vorliegende Beitrag diskutiert unter Rückgriff auf Blumenbergs Begriffspaar Weltzeit/Lebenszeit die unterschiedlichen Codierungen der Krise in Goetz’ Johann Holtrop (2012) und Timms Vogelweide (2013), deren Protagonisten (ein Topmanager und der Besitzer einer Softwarefirma) in der Folge der New-Economy-Krise der Nullerjahre aus ihren bisherigen Lebensbahnen geworfen werden. Während sich Holtrop erfolglos bemüht, seinen verlorenen Posten in der Weltzeit zurückzuerobern, und dabei die zeitbeschleunigenden Mechanismen der Krise neurotisch reproduziert, zieht sich Eschenbach auf eine unbewohnte Nordseeinsel zurück. Dort widersteht er dem Zwang zur Zeitoptimierung und somit der Dramatisierung und Teleologisierung der Krisenzeit; er entdeckt eine von der Krise nicht kolonisierte Sprache – er gewinnt an Zeit, an Lebenszeit. Dieser Paradigmenwechsel von Weltzeit zu Lebenszeit hat narratologische Relevanz für eine Literatur der Krise, die sich dem dominanten, mediengesteuerten Krisendiskurs mit seinen Untergangs- bzw. Rettungsalgorithmen entziehen will.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CORRADO Krise (Timm, Goetz).pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 390.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
390.94 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/214359
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact