This chapter, based on the results of ethnographic work in Naples, explores the internal frictions that occur within LGBTQIA+ communities. How is identity (and alterity) built nowadays? Despite the emergence of the virtual, identity has become more ‘corporeal’ than ever. The analysis of non-heteronormative experiences is particularly valuable for exploring the link between the body – and its languages – and paths of identity and alterity. A compliant body and body language allow for the private and public recognition that is at the basis of the construction of identity (and alterity). Being recognisable and recognised, and being able to develop a ‘feeling of belonging’ that validates existence, means having the chance to claim and possibly acquire agency and rights. Nonetheless, belonging to one category may lead to the exclusion of those who do not belong to it completely. This logic applies within marginalised groups such as LGBTQIA+ communities too, and leads to reflections about the ambivalence of the processes of classification and categorisation that may or may not serve as tools of public recognition and social inclusion.
Imagined others: Paths of identity, alterity, and exclusion in LGBTQIA+ communities
Marzia Mauriello
2022-01-01
Abstract
This chapter, based on the results of ethnographic work in Naples, explores the internal frictions that occur within LGBTQIA+ communities. How is identity (and alterity) built nowadays? Despite the emergence of the virtual, identity has become more ‘corporeal’ than ever. The analysis of non-heteronormative experiences is particularly valuable for exploring the link between the body – and its languages – and paths of identity and alterity. A compliant body and body language allow for the private and public recognition that is at the basis of the construction of identity (and alterity). Being recognisable and recognised, and being able to develop a ‘feeling of belonging’ that validates existence, means having the chance to claim and possibly acquire agency and rights. Nonetheless, belonging to one category may lead to the exclusion of those who do not belong to it completely. This logic applies within marginalised groups such as LGBTQIA+ communities too, and leads to reflections about the ambivalence of the processes of classification and categorisation that may or may not serve as tools of public recognition and social inclusion.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Mauriello_ImaginedOthers.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
963.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
963.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.