This chapter explores how Korean speakers understand and talk about “politeness” and related metaconcepts. Data is drawn from qualitative interviews with 20 Korean speakers (10 students in their 20s and 10 professors aged 40 and above). We asked them to provide their own personal definitions of six metaconcepts: yeyuy paluta ‘possess correct civility’, yeyuy epsta ‘lack civility’, concwunghata ‘be respectful’, musihata ‘be disrespectful’, chincelhata ‘be courteous’, and pwulcincelhata ‘be discourteous.’ We analyse how the participants defined these six concepts, and then look at four other important metalexemes that emerged in the data: phyenhata ‘comfortable’, thayto ‘embodied attitude’, paylye ‘consideration’ and inceng ‘recognition’. Through analysis of these different concepts, we are able to construct an emic (participant-oriented) picture of what politeness means across two different generations of Korean speakers. We conclude by discussing how the results compare to previous descriptions of politeness in Korean, and also to the models of politeness offered in previous politeness theories.
What do Korean speakers know about politeness?
Soung-U Kim
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2024-01-01
Abstract
This chapter explores how Korean speakers understand and talk about “politeness” and related metaconcepts. Data is drawn from qualitative interviews with 20 Korean speakers (10 students in their 20s and 10 professors aged 40 and above). We asked them to provide their own personal definitions of six metaconcepts: yeyuy paluta ‘possess correct civility’, yeyuy epsta ‘lack civility’, concwunghata ‘be respectful’, musihata ‘be disrespectful’, chincelhata ‘be courteous’, and pwulcincelhata ‘be discourteous.’ We analyse how the participants defined these six concepts, and then look at four other important metalexemes that emerged in the data: phyenhata ‘comfortable’, thayto ‘embodied attitude’, paylye ‘consideration’ and inceng ‘recognition’. Through analysis of these different concepts, we are able to construct an emic (participant-oriented) picture of what politeness means across two different generations of Korean speakers. We conclude by discussing how the results compare to previous descriptions of politeness in Korean, and also to the models of politeness offered in previous politeness theories.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kim_Brown_2024_Chapter_download.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Capitolo contribuito al volume.
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.31 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.31 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
ShinKim_2024_Final_publication.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Tutto il libro in cui si trova il capitolo.
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
10.5 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
10.5 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
