This chapter explores how Korean speakers understand and talk about “politeness” and related metaconcepts. Data is drawn from qualitative interviews with 20 Korean speakers (10 students in their 20s and 10 professors aged 40 and above). We asked them to provide their own personal definitions of six metaconcepts: yeyuy paluta ‘possess correct civility’, yeyuy epsta ‘lack civility’, concwunghata ‘be respectful’, musihata ‘be disrespectful’, chincelhata ‘be courteous’, and pwulcincelhata ‘be discourteous.’ We analyse how the participants defined these six concepts, and then look at four other important metalexemes that emerged in the data: phyenhata ‘comfortable’, thayto ‘embodied attitude’, paylye ‘consideration’ and inceng ‘recognition’. Through analysis of these different concepts, we are able to construct an emic (participant-oriented) picture of what politeness means across two different generations of Korean speakers. We conclude by discussing how the results compare to previous descriptions of politeness in Korean, and also to the models of politeness offered in previous politeness theories.

What do Korean speakers know about politeness?

Soung-U Kim
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

This chapter explores how Korean speakers understand and talk about “politeness” and related metaconcepts. Data is drawn from qualitative interviews with 20 Korean speakers (10 students in their 20s and 10 professors aged 40 and above). We asked them to provide their own personal definitions of six metaconcepts: yeyuy paluta ‘possess correct civility’, yeyuy epsta ‘lack civility’, concwunghata ‘be respectful’, musihata ‘be disrespectful’, chincelhata ‘be courteous’, and pwulcincelhata ‘be discourteous.’ We analyse how the participants defined these six concepts, and then look at four other important metalexemes that emerged in the data: phyenhata ‘comfortable’, thayto ‘embodied attitude’, paylye ‘consideration’ and inceng ‘recognition’. Through analysis of these different concepts, we are able to construct an emic (participant-oriented) picture of what politeness means across two different generations of Korean speakers. We conclude by discussing how the results compare to previous descriptions of politeness in Korean, and also to the models of politeness offered in previous politeness theories.
2024
978-3-031-50697-0
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Kim_Brown_2024_Chapter_download.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Capitolo contribuito al volume.
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.31 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
ShinKim_2024_Final_publication.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Tutto il libro in cui si trova il capitolo.
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 10.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
10.5 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/229381
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact