Starting from Alois Riegl’s seminal monument-theory and notably from both main values conveyed by the monument, that is its eloquence for the present, and its capacity for remembrance, the article puts forward the hypothesis that various memorials presented as counter-monuments and "monumental" contemporary art installations employ techniques of quasi-sublimity between post-minimalism, devices of absence, iconoclastic operations, and the digital sublime. The paradox is that precisely through a monumentality that is often provocative and iconoclastic, the memorial objective is renewed as a contemporary value.

"Counter-Monument and Digital Iconoclasm as Quasi-Sublime Devices"

Elena Tavani
2025-01-01

Abstract

Starting from Alois Riegl’s seminal monument-theory and notably from both main values conveyed by the monument, that is its eloquence for the present, and its capacity for remembrance, the article puts forward the hypothesis that various memorials presented as counter-monuments and "monumental" contemporary art installations employ techniques of quasi-sublimity between post-minimalism, devices of absence, iconoclastic operations, and the digital sublime. The paradox is that precisely through a monumentality that is often provocative and iconoclastic, the memorial objective is renewed as a contemporary value.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
tavani_counter-monument-digital-iconoclasm.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 396.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
396.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/246080
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact