Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in machine translation (MT), specifically concerning high-resource European languages. However, their extensive computational requirements raise sustainability concerns. This paper investigates the potential of smaller, fine-tuned language models as a more sustainable alternative for MT tasks. We conduct a comparative analysis of model performance in terms of translation quality and CO2eq emissions, and examine the key errors associated with using smaller models. Furthermore, we propose a novel metric that balances translation quality against environmental impact, aiming to inform more sustainable model selection in MT research and practice.
Balancing Translation Quality and Environmental Impact: Comparing Large and Small Language Models
Antonio Castaldo;Petra Giommarelli;Johanna Monti
2025-01-01
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in machine translation (MT), specifically concerning high-resource European languages. However, their extensive computational requirements raise sustainability concerns. This paper investigates the potential of smaller, fine-tuned language models as a more sustainable alternative for MT tasks. We conduct a comparative analysis of model performance in terms of translation quality and CO2eq emissions, and examine the key errors associated with using smaller models. Furthermore, we propose a novel metric that balances translation quality against environmental impact, aiming to inform more sustainable model selection in MT research and practice.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
19_main_long.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
770.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
770.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
