Od. 8 and 22 provide valuable information about the profession of the bard. An analysis of the relationship between Odysseus and Demodocus and between Odysseus and Phemius shows that the bard’s voice is authoritative not only because he learns the subject matter of his song from the gods, but also because his story is validated by those who were protagonists or eyewitnesses to the events narrated. Even in epic poetry, before historiography, there is a reflection on the conditions under which an oral tale can be considered reliable.

Demodocus, Odysseus, and the Double Standard of Authority in Speech

Riccardo Palmisciano
2025-01-01

Abstract

Od. 8 and 22 provide valuable information about the profession of the bard. An analysis of the relationship between Odysseus and Demodocus and between Odysseus and Phemius shows that the bard’s voice is authoritative not only because he learns the subject matter of his song from the gods, but also because his story is validated by those who were protagonists or eyewitnesses to the events narrated. Even in epic poetry, before historiography, there is a reflection on the conditions under which an oral tale can be considered reliable.
2025
9783111431611
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Demodocus_Rethinking Orality.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 301.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
301.5 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/254280
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact