Od. 8 and 22 provide valuable information about the profession of the bard. An analysis of the relationship between Odysseus and Demodocus and between Odysseus and Phemius shows that the bard’s voice is authoritative not only because he learns the subject matter of his song from the gods, but also because his story is validated by those who were protagonists or eyewitnesses to the events narrated. Even in epic poetry, before historiography, there is a reflection on the conditions under which an oral tale can be considered reliable.
Demodocus, Odysseus, and the Double Standard of Authority in Speech
Riccardo Palmisciano
2025-01-01
Abstract
Od. 8 and 22 provide valuable information about the profession of the bard. An analysis of the relationship between Odysseus and Demodocus and between Odysseus and Phemius shows that the bard’s voice is authoritative not only because he learns the subject matter of his song from the gods, but also because his story is validated by those who were protagonists or eyewitnesses to the events narrated. Even in epic poetry, before historiography, there is a reflection on the conditions under which an oral tale can be considered reliable.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Demodocus_Rethinking Orality.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
301.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
301.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
