The paper provides a historical-critical analysis of the belief-desire model (or desire-belief model), the standard framework for the genesis and causal explanation of human action in analytic philosophy. Formulated in the early 1960s by Donald Davidson ‒ in opposition to Wittgensteinian anti-causalism ‒ in his influential essay “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” (1963) it has since become the definitive reference point in action theory. This study first traces the historical origins of the model prior to Davidson; it then demonstrates that, while rooted in Humean principles, the Davidsonian version is significantly informed by contemporary decision theory and represents, at least in general terms, a restatement of Aristotle’s theory of deliberation.

Between Hume and Aristotle: Historical Perspectives on Davidson’s Belief-Desire Model

Antonio Rainone
In corso di stampa

Abstract

The paper provides a historical-critical analysis of the belief-desire model (or desire-belief model), the standard framework for the genesis and causal explanation of human action in analytic philosophy. Formulated in the early 1960s by Donald Davidson ‒ in opposition to Wittgensteinian anti-causalism ‒ in his influential essay “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” (1963) it has since become the definitive reference point in action theory. This study first traces the historical origins of the model prior to Davidson; it then demonstrates that, while rooted in Humean principles, the Davidsonian version is significantly informed by contemporary decision theory and represents, at least in general terms, a restatement of Aristotle’s theory of deliberation.
In corso di stampa
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/259262
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact