This paper examines the constitutional-political direction within the framework of the bidirectional relationship between Parliament and the Constitutional Court. On one hand, the analysis focuses on the types of decisions rendered by the Court and the resulting (or preceding) parliamentary inertia. On the other, it highlights instances in which the Constitutional Court adopts an overly cautious approach, even when individual parliamentarians seek its protection. The research thus centers on this dual inertia—a phenomenon that directly calls into question the respective spheres of competence of each institution in defining political and constitutional policy.

Sui rapporti tra Corte costituzionale e Parlamento di fronte alle omissioni legislative: alcune riflessioni

F. Zammartino
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper examines the constitutional-political direction within the framework of the bidirectional relationship between Parliament and the Constitutional Court. On one hand, the analysis focuses on the types of decisions rendered by the Court and the resulting (or preceding) parliamentary inertia. On the other, it highlights instances in which the Constitutional Court adopts an overly cautious approach, even when individual parliamentarians seek its protection. The research thus centers on this dual inertia—a phenomenon that directly calls into question the respective spheres of competence of each institution in defining political and constitutional policy.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
13926-27878-1-PB.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 633.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
633.26 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/261321
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact