This paper examines the constitutional-political direction within the framework of the bidirectional relationship between Parliament and the Constitutional Court. On one hand, the analysis focuses on the types of decisions rendered by the Court and the resulting (or preceding) parliamentary inertia. On the other, it highlights instances in which the Constitutional Court adopts an overly cautious approach, even when individual parliamentarians seek its protection. The research thus centers on this dual inertia—a phenomenon that directly calls into question the respective spheres of competence of each institution in defining political and constitutional policy.
Sui rapporti tra Corte costituzionale e Parlamento di fronte alle omissioni legislative: alcune riflessioni
F. Zammartino
2026-01-01
Abstract
This paper examines the constitutional-political direction within the framework of the bidirectional relationship between Parliament and the Constitutional Court. On one hand, the analysis focuses on the types of decisions rendered by the Court and the resulting (or preceding) parliamentary inertia. On the other, it highlights instances in which the Constitutional Court adopts an overly cautious approach, even when individual parliamentarians seek its protection. The research thus centers on this dual inertia—a phenomenon that directly calls into question the respective spheres of competence of each institution in defining political and constitutional policy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
13926-27878-1-PB.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
633.26 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
633.26 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
