This essay questions itself on the possibility of a foundation of ethic beginning from the work of two authors -Aristotle and Hegel-, who prefer to investigate the tie between ethic and athropology, rather than focusing on the metaphisical aspect of the subject. While acknowledging the status of ethic as linked, and indipendent at the same time, to politics and moral, Aristotle and Hegel cosidering the specificity of actions moved by a particular purpose, place on the foreground the “second nature”, the habits and customs as the first line of ethic. As the etymology of ethos -from oikos, house- suggests, the study of ethic cannot ignore the inborn tendency of mankind to feel at home. In this context, more than on a foundation in a metaphysical sense, the focus is set on the ground where the structures of anthropogenesis are rooted: a never ending process, always moving and at risk in relation to the prevailing of stasis or mobility, of fear or creativity, in a game where the “human” ittself is in danger. The possibility of “being otherwise” of freedom is preserved by the vitality of this cure of ethics as a cure of the human.

Fondazione dell'etica: un ossimoro? Per un'etica dell'opacità

BONITO OLIVA, Rossella
2009

Abstract

This essay questions itself on the possibility of a foundation of ethic beginning from the work of two authors -Aristotle and Hegel-, who prefer to investigate the tie between ethic and athropology, rather than focusing on the metaphisical aspect of the subject. While acknowledging the status of ethic as linked, and indipendent at the same time, to politics and moral, Aristotle and Hegel cosidering the specificity of actions moved by a particular purpose, place on the foreground the “second nature”, the habits and customs as the first line of ethic. As the etymology of ethos -from oikos, house- suggests, the study of ethic cannot ignore the inborn tendency of mankind to feel at home. In this context, more than on a foundation in a metaphysical sense, the focus is set on the ground where the structures of anthropogenesis are rooted: a never ending process, always moving and at risk in relation to the prevailing of stasis or mobility, of fear or creativity, in a game where the “human” ittself is in danger. The possibility of “being otherwise” of freedom is preserved by the vitality of this cure of ethics as a cure of the human.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bonito Oliva - Fondazione dell'etica.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 169.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
169.02 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11574/39573
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact